Quick charity verification for Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La (EIN: 200745737)
Verdict: Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La appears trustworthy
90/100Mission Score
$71KRevenue
$121KAssets
1Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Fluctuating annual revenue, which could impact long-term program planning and stability if not managed with reserves.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds and potentially a volunteer-driven model.
Strong asset growth from $1 in 2014 to $146,483 in 2023, demonstrating excellent financial management.
No reported liabilities in recent years (2017-2023), indicating a very healthy balance sheet.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history (12 filings), showing commitment to transparency and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La
Is Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La (EIN: 200745737) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La a good charity to donate to?
Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $71K. Assets: $121K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La is 200745737. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La spend its money?
Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La's tax-exempt status using EIN 200745737 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La demonstrates a generally healthy financial position, with assets consistently exceeding liabilities, indicating good fiscal management. The organization's revenue has fluctuated significantly over the past decade, ranging from a low of $15,137 in 2020 to a high of $163,755 in 2016, and most recently $113,323 in 2023. Despite these fluctuations, expenses have generally been managed within or close to revenue levels, as seen in 2023 where expenses were $117,310 against $113,323 in revenue, showing a slight deficit but overall stability. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings suggests a strong volunteer-driven model or that compensation falls below reporting thresholds, which enhances transparency regarding operational costs.
The organization's spending efficiency appears strong, particularly given the absence of reported officer compensation, which often constitutes a significant portion of administrative costs for many nonprofits. With no liabilities reported in recent years (2017-2023), the organization maintains a very clean balance sheet. The growth in assets from $1 in 2014 to $146,483 in 2023 further underscores prudent financial stewardship and an ability to build reserves. This financial stability, combined with the consistent filing of IRS 990 forms, indicates a commitment to transparency and accountability.
Overall, Ka Leo O Laka I Ka Hikina O Ka La exhibits characteristics of a well-managed small nonprofit. Its ability to operate without significant executive compensation, maintain a healthy asset-to-liability ratio, and consistently file its financial disclosures points to a transparent and efficient operation. The primary area for potential improvement or further inquiry would be understanding the specific breakdown of program versus administrative and fundraising expenses, as this data is not explicitly provided in the summary, but the lack of officer compensation suggests a lean administrative structure.