Is Kansas University Orthopedic Association Legit?

Quick charity verification for Kansas University Orthopedic Association (EIN: 200826330)

Verdict: Kansas University Orthopedic Association shows mixed signals

60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Kansas University Orthopedic Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Kansas University Orthopedic Association

Is Kansas University Orthopedic Association a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Kansas University Orthopedic Association (EIN: 200826330) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Kansas University Orthopedic Association a good charity to donate to?

Kansas University Orthopedic Association has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Kansas University Orthopedic Association?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Kansas University Orthopedic Association is 200826330. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Kansas University Orthopedic Association spend its money?

Kansas University Orthopedic Association allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Kansas University Orthopedic Association's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Kansas University Orthopedic Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 200826330 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Kansas University Orthopedic Association appears to be a financially stable organization based on its historical IRS 990 filings, consistently reporting positive net income in most years. For instance, in 2016, the organization reported revenues of $8,956,759 against expenses of $7,783,317, indicating a surplus. However, the most recent data provided shows $0 in revenue and assets, which is a significant discrepancy from previous years and raises questions about the current operational status or reporting accuracy. The organization has consistently reported zero officer compensation, which is unusual for an organization of its size and could indicate that executive compensation is reported under other expense categories or that the organization is entirely volunteer-run at the executive level. This lack of detail impacts transparency regarding leadership costs. Spending efficiency, based on the available data, shows that the organization generally spends less than it brings in, allowing for asset growth. For example, assets grew from $1,154,721 in 2011 to $281,379 in 2016, though there was a significant drop in assets between 2015 and 2016. The absence of a detailed functional expense breakdown (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging. Without this information, it's difficult to determine what percentage of funds directly support their mission versus overhead. The transparency of the organization is somewhat limited by the provided data. While the consistent filing of IRS 990s is a positive sign of compliance, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns and the zero officer compensation reported across multiple years, especially for an organization with millions in revenue, warrants further investigation. The sudden drop to $0 revenue and assets in the latest period is a major concern for transparency and financial health, suggesting a potential cessation of operations or a significant change in reporting structure that is not immediately clear.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages