No officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-driven model and efficient use of any funds for direct mission (if any funds are available).
Spending Breakdown
How Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition
Is Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition (EIN: 208224968) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition a good charity to donate to?
Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $1. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition is 208224968. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition spend its money?
Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition's tax-exempt status using EIN 208224968 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Kenai Area Fishermans Coalition appears to be a very small, likely volunteer-run organization, given its consistently low revenue and expenses over the past decade. In its latest filing (201912), the organization reported $0 in revenue and $2,628 in expenses, with only $1 in assets. This financial profile suggests minimal operational activity and a reliance on in-kind support or very limited direct financial transactions. The organization's financial health is extremely precarious, with assets barely existing and revenue frequently failing to cover even minimal expenses, as seen in 201912 and 201812.
Spending efficiency is difficult to assess with such low figures, but the consistent reporting of expenses, even without corresponding revenue, indicates some level of activity. However, without a breakdown of these minimal expenses, it's impossible to determine the proportion dedicated to programs versus administrative or fundraising costs. The organization's transparency is adequate in terms of filing its IRS 990s, but the lack of detailed financial activity makes a deeper analysis challenging. The absence of officer compensation further supports the notion of a volunteer-driven entity.