Long history of IRS 990 filings (10 filings), indicating good transparency over time.
Spending Breakdown
How King Ranch Foundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about King Ranch Foundation Inc
Is King Ranch Foundation Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, King Ranch Foundation Inc (EIN: 200158699) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is King Ranch Foundation Inc a good charity to donate to?
King Ranch Foundation Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $49K. Assets: $462K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for King Ranch Foundation Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for King Ranch Foundation Inc is 200158699. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does King Ranch Foundation Inc spend its money?
King Ranch Foundation Inc allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify King Ranch Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify King Ranch Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 200158699 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The King Ranch Foundation Inc. appears to be a small, stable organization with consistent assets over the past decade, averaging around $480,000. However, its financial health shows a trend of expenses frequently exceeding revenue in recent years, as seen in 2023 ($29,295 expenses vs. $19,962 revenue) and 2022 ($32,180 expenses vs. $15,311 revenue). This consistent deficit spending, while not immediately critical given its asset base, suggests a reliance on drawing down reserves or inconsistent funding streams.
The organization demonstrates strong spending efficiency in terms of executive compensation, reporting 0% officer compensation across all available filings, indicating that leadership is likely unpaid or compensated through other means not reflected as officer compensation. Without detailed expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising), a full assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. However, the lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator of resource allocation.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of 10 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of minimal liabilities ($0-$1) also suggests sound financial management in that regard. The primary area for improved transparency would be a more detailed breakdown of expenses to fully understand how funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising.