Is Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation Legit?
Quick charity verification for Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation (EIN: 208918710)
Verdict: Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$4KRevenue
$72KAssets
2Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Significant drop in latest reported revenue to $3,500 from $146,350 in the prior period, which could impact future operations.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data limits granular efficiency analysis.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filing periods, indicating volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds.
Strong financial solvency with zero liabilities reported in all available filings.
Significant asset growth, reaching $91,572 in 202212, demonstrating an ability to build reserves.
History of consistent IRS 990 filings over 11 periods, indicating good compliance and transparency.
Positive net income in several periods, notably $78,133 in 202212, contributing to asset building.
Spending Breakdown
How Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation
Is Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation (EIN: 208918710) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation a good charity to donate to?
Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $4K. Assets: $72K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation is 208918710. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation spend its money?
Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation's tax-exempt status using EIN 208918710 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Kirker African Medical Reliefassociation demonstrates a fluctuating but generally positive financial trajectory, particularly in its most recent filing period (202212) where revenue significantly outpaced expenses ($146,350 vs. $68,217), leading to substantial asset growth to $91,572. However, the latest reported revenue of $3,500 is a sharp decline from the previous period, which warrants further investigation to understand if this is an anomaly or a new trend. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities and zero officer compensation across all available filings, indicating strong financial solvency and a commitment to volunteer leadership, which are positive indicators for transparency and efficiency. While the organization's assets have grown considerably over time, the recent drop in revenue could impact future program delivery if not addressed.
The organization's spending efficiency appears strong, especially given the consistent absence of officer compensation, meaning donor funds are not being used for executive salaries. The significant revenue in 202212 allowed for substantial program activities relative to its size. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The consistent growth in assets over the years, despite some periods of negative net income, suggests prudent financial management and an ability to build reserves.
Transparency is high regarding executive compensation and liabilities, as both are consistently reported as zero. The consistent filing of IRS 990s over 11 periods also indicates a commitment to regulatory compliance and public disclosure. However, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated across programs, administration, and fundraising. Further transparency on these breakdowns would enhance understanding of their operational efficiency.