Maintains a healthy asset base, historically ranging from $487,634 to $617,328, providing financial stability.
Consistently reports $0 in liabilities, indicating a debt-free financial position.
Spending Breakdown
How Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation
Is Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation (EIN: 202241890) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation is 202241890. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation spend its money?
Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 202241890 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Kreutzkamp Supporting Foundation appears to be a private foundation, as indicated by its consistent asset base and fluctuating, but generally low, revenue and expenses. The organization has reported $0 in revenue and assets in its latest filing, which could indicate a period of inactivity or a change in reporting status. Historically, its revenue has varied significantly, from a low of $19,469 in 2012 to a high of $178,292 in 2016. Expenses have also fluctuated, sometimes exceeding revenue, such as in 2018 where expenses were $108,100 against $69,531 in revenue, suggesting it drew from its asset base. The foundation consistently reports $0 in liabilities, indicating a strong balance sheet with no debt.
Given the available data, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests that executive leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which can be a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding overhead. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a full transparency assessment, but the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s demonstrates a commitment to regulatory compliance.
Overall, the foundation maintains a healthy asset base, historically ranging from $487,634 to $617,328, which provides a buffer for its operations. The recent $0 revenue and assets filing warrants further investigation to understand its current operational status. Without more granular expense data, a definitive conclusion on spending efficiency and program impact is difficult, but the absence of officer compensation is a notable positive.