Zero revenue and assets in the latest filing, indicating potential inactivity or dormancy.
Declining trend in assets from $33,478 in 2014 to $0 in the latest period.
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds for a small organization.
Historically low liabilities ($0 across all filings), suggesting sound financial management in prior periods.
Spending Breakdown
How Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation
Is Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation (EIN: 16005729) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation a good charity to donate to?
Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation is 16005729. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation spend its money?
Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation's tax-exempt status using EIN 16005729 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Lewiston Auburn Jewish Federation appears to be a very small, community-focused organization with minimal financial activity. The latest filing shows $0 in both revenue and assets, which could indicate a period of dormancy or a significant change in operations not fully captured by the available data. In prior years (2012-2014), the organization operated with modest revenues, ranging from $13,289 to $22,910, and expenses generally in a similar range. The consistent reporting of $0 in officer compensation across all available filings suggests a volunteer-driven leadership structure, which is a positive indicator for a small nonprofit. However, the current lack of financial activity raises questions about its ongoing operational status and future viability.