Quick charity verification for Louisburg Soccer Club (EIN: 201492016)
Verdict: Louisburg Soccer Club shows mixed signals
50/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
No reported revenue or assets, indicating potential inactivity or lack of operations.
Insufficient financial data to assess financial health or program effectiveness.
Strengths
No reported liabilities (implied by $0 assets and revenue).
Spending Breakdown
How Louisburg Soccer Club allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Louisburg Soccer Club
Is Louisburg Soccer Club a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Louisburg Soccer Club (EIN: 201492016) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 50/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Louisburg Soccer Club a good charity to donate to?
Louisburg Soccer Club has a Mission Score of 50/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Louisburg Soccer Club?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Louisburg Soccer Club is 201492016. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Louisburg Soccer Club spend its money?
Louisburg Soccer Club allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Louisburg Soccer Club's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Louisburg Soccer Club's tax-exempt status using EIN 201492016 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Louisburg Soccer Club appears to be a very small, potentially newly formed, or inactive organization based on the provided IRS 990 data. With $0 in reported revenue and assets, there is no financial activity to analyze regarding financial health or spending efficiency. The lack of financial data makes it impossible to assess their operational effectiveness or how funds are being utilized. Transparency is limited by the absence of financial details, as there are no transactions to report or disclose.
Given the zero revenue and assets, it's highly probable that the organization either did not operate financially during the reporting period, is in its very early stages before significant financial activity, or is no longer active. Without any financial inflows or outflows, there's no basis to evaluate their financial management or the impact of any programs. Further investigation into their current operational status would be necessary to provide a meaningful financial assessment.