Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential inactivity or significant operational change.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided data.
Strengths
Consistent positive net assets across reported periods (e.g., $37,312 assets in 2015 with $0 liabilities).
No reported officer compensation across all filings, suggesting volunteer leadership or efficient compensation practices.
Consistent filing history with the IRS, indicating transparency in reporting.
Maintained a surplus in most reported years (e.g., $126,481 revenue vs. $112,902 expenses in 2015).
Spending Breakdown
How Louisiana Rip Baseball allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Louisiana Rip Baseball
Is Louisiana Rip Baseball a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Louisiana Rip Baseball (EIN: 205477279) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Louisiana Rip Baseball a good charity to donate to?
Louisiana Rip Baseball has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Louisiana Rip Baseball?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Louisiana Rip Baseball is 205477279. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Louisiana Rip Baseball spend its money?
Louisiana Rip Baseball allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Louisiana Rip Baseball's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Louisiana Rip Baseball's tax-exempt status using EIN 205477279 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Louisiana Rip Baseball appears to be a small, community-focused organization with a consistent operational history based on its IRS 990 filings. The organization has maintained positive net assets across all reported periods, indicating sound financial management. For instance, in 2015, it reported assets of $37,312 with no liabilities, demonstrating a healthy balance sheet. Its revenue and expenses have been relatively stable, hovering around $100,000-$120,000 annually, suggesting a predictable operational scale. The most recent filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which could indicate a period of inactivity or a change in reporting status, warranting further investigation.
The organization's spending efficiency seems reasonable given the available data. In 2015, with revenues of $126,481 and expenses of $112,902, it managed to retain a surplus. A key strength is the reported 0% officer compensation across all filings, which suggests that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not reported as officer compensation, potentially maximizing funds for programs. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising), a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging.
Transparency is generally good through its 990 filings, which are publicly available. The consistent filing history is a positive indicator. However, the lack of detailed expense categorization in the provided summary limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising. The $0 revenue and assets in the latest report are a significant data point that requires clarification for a complete transparency picture.