Quick charity verification for Ludlow Streetscapes (EIN: 10732021)
Verdict: Ludlow Streetscapes has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
No reported revenue or assets in latest data, suggesting inactivity or data incompleteness.
Only one IRS 990 filing available, making trend analysis impossible.
Significant deficit in the only reported financial period ($332 revenue vs. $4,159 expenses in 2011).
Strengths
No officer compensation reported, indicating a volunteer-driven model.
No reported liabilities in 2011, suggesting a debt-free status at that time.
Spending Breakdown
How Ludlow Streetscapes allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
100%
Admin Costs
High — over 25% on administration
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ludlow Streetscapes
Is Ludlow Streetscapes a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Ludlow Streetscapes (EIN: 10732021) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Ludlow Streetscapes a good charity to donate to?
Ludlow Streetscapes has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Ludlow Streetscapes?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Ludlow Streetscapes is 10732021. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Ludlow Streetscapes spend its money?
Ludlow Streetscapes allocates 0% to programs, 100% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Ludlow Streetscapes's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Ludlow Streetscapes's tax-exempt status using EIN 10732021 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Ludlow Streetscapes appears to be a very small, likely volunteer-run organization based on its financial filings. In its most recent reported period (201112), the organization reported only $332 in revenue against $4,159 in expenses, indicating a significant deficit for that year. Its assets were $3,323 with no reported liabilities, suggesting a modest financial base. The lack of reported officer compensation further supports the notion of a volunteer-driven model, which can be a positive sign for efficiency in very small organizations.
However, the complete absence of revenue and assets in the latest data provided ($0 for both) is concerning. This could indicate the organization is no longer active, or that the provided 'latest revenue' and 'assets' data points are not current or complete. Without more recent financial activity, it's difficult to assess current financial health or spending efficiency. The single filing from 2011 makes it challenging to evaluate long-term trends or current operational status.