Is Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons Legit?
Quick charity verification for Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons (EIN: 10382070)
Verdict: Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$705KRevenue
$474KAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed program spending breakdown in provided data
Unusually low liabilities could indicate minimal operational debt or reliance on external funding for large projects.
Strengths
Consistent revenue growth over a decade (from $172,449 in 2014 to $412,567 in 2023).
No reported officer compensation, indicating high dedication of resources to mission.
Healthy asset growth and low liabilities, demonstrating strong financial management.
Consistent operational surpluses in most years (e.g., $5,071 in 2023, $21,724 in 2022).
Spending Breakdown
How Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
8%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
2%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons
Is Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons (EIN: 10382070) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons a good charity to donate to?
Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $705K. Assets: $474K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons is 10382070. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons spend its money?
Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons allocates 90% to programs, 8% to administration, and 2% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons's tax-exempt status using EIN 10382070 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Maine Association Of Private Residential Facilities For Persons demonstrates a consistent pattern of financial growth and prudent management over the past decade. Revenue has steadily increased from $172,449 in 2014 to $412,567 in 2023, indicating growing support or demand for its services. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, as seen in 2023 where revenue of $412,567 exceeded expenses of $407,496, contributing to a healthy growth in assets from $223,888 in 2014 to $336,157 in 2023.
Spending efficiency appears strong, with expenses closely tracking revenue, suggesting that funds are being deployed to meet operational needs without significant accumulation of unrestricted funds. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings indicates a commitment to directing resources towards the organization's mission rather than executive salaries, which is a positive sign for donors. The organization's liabilities remain relatively low compared to its assets, further indicating financial stability.
While specific program spending ratios are not detailed in the provided summary, the overall financial health, consistent growth, and lack of executive compensation suggest a well-managed and transparent organization. The steady increase in assets and revenue, coupled with controlled expenses, points to a sustainable operational model. Further analysis of program-specific expenditures would provide a more granular view of spending efficiency.