Quick charity verification for Maine Equal Justice Project (EIN: 10503454)
Verdict: Maine Equal Justice Project appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
1Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of recent financial data (latest filing is 2017)
Strengths
High program spending ratio (estimated 85% in 2017)
Efficient use of funds (expenses nearly equal revenue in 2017)
No reported officer compensation in 2017
Positive net assets and no liabilities reported in 2017
Spending Breakdown
How Maine Equal Justice Project allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Maine Equal Justice Project
Is Maine Equal Justice Project a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Maine Equal Justice Project (EIN: 10503454) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Maine Equal Justice Project a good charity to donate to?
Maine Equal Justice Project has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Maine Equal Justice Project?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Maine Equal Justice Project is 10503454. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Maine Equal Justice Project spend its money?
Maine Equal Justice Project allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Maine Equal Justice Project's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Maine Equal Justice Project's tax-exempt status using EIN 10503454 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Maine Equal Justice Project demonstrates a strong commitment to its programmatic mission, as evidenced by its 2017 financial data. With total expenses of $1,843,641 against revenues of $1,871,568, the organization operated efficiently, spending nearly all of its income on its operations. The absence of reported officer compensation in 2017 suggests either a volunteer-led executive team or compensation below the reporting threshold, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to mission-related activities. However, the lack of more recent financial data beyond 2017 makes a current assessment of financial health challenging.
The organization's financial health in 2017 appears stable, with assets of $29,620 and no reported liabilities, indicating a healthy balance sheet for that period. The high percentage of program spending, estimated at 85%, further reinforces its focus on delivering its mission. To enhance transparency, providing more current financial statements and detailed breakdowns of administrative and fundraising costs would be beneficial for stakeholders.