Is Maine Sciety For Histotechnology Legit?

Quick charity verification for Maine Sciety For Histotechnology (EIN: 16048312)

Verdict: Maine Sciety For Histotechnology appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$525Revenue
$2KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Maine Sciety For Histotechnology allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Maine Sciety For Histotechnology

Is Maine Sciety For Histotechnology a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Maine Sciety For Histotechnology (EIN: 16048312) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Maine Sciety For Histotechnology a good charity to donate to?

Maine Sciety For Histotechnology has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $525. Assets: $2K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Maine Sciety For Histotechnology?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Maine Sciety For Histotechnology is 16048312. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Maine Sciety For Histotechnology spend its money?

Maine Sciety For Histotechnology allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Maine Sciety For Histotechnology's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Maine Sciety For Histotechnology's tax-exempt status using EIN 16048312 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Maine Society For Histotechnology appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization with limited financial activity. Its revenue has been consistently low, ranging from $12 to $938 over the past five years, and it has frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses often exceeding revenue. For example, in 2015, revenue was $12 while expenses were $499, and in 2014, revenue was $112 against $1,164 in expenses. The organization's assets have steadily declined from $4,594 in 2012 to $2,011 in 2016, indicating a trend of spending down its reserves. Given its minimal financial scale and zero reported officer compensation, it likely relies heavily on volunteer efforts and has very low overhead, which is positive for efficiency. However, the consistent decline in assets and frequent operating deficits suggest potential long-term sustainability challenges if revenue streams do not improve. Transparency is generally good for an organization of this size, as it files its IRS Form 990, making its financial data publicly accessible. The absence of liabilities across all reported periods is a positive indicator of fiscal responsibility. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall revenue-to-expense ratio. The organization's small scale and specific niche (histotechnology) suggest its impact is likely focused within a very particular community, and its financial health reflects the challenges often faced by very small, specialized nonprofits.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages