Zero officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds.
Healthy asset-to-liability ratio, with zero liabilities in recent years (e.g., 202406, 202306, 202206).
Resilient revenue recovery post-pandemic, reaching $92,279 in 202406.
Long operational history with 13 filings, suggesting stability and commitment.
Spending Breakdown
How Maui Classical Music Festival allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Maui Classical Music Festival
Is Maui Classical Music Festival a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Maui Classical Music Festival (EIN: 161672016) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Maui Classical Music Festival a good charity to donate to?
Maui Classical Music Festival has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $86K. Assets: $56K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Maui Classical Music Festival?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Maui Classical Music Festival is 161672016. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Maui Classical Music Festival spend its money?
Maui Classical Music Festival allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Maui Classical Music Festival's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Maui Classical Music Festival's tax-exempt status using EIN 161672016 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Maui Classical Music Festival demonstrates consistent financial activity, operating on a relatively small scale with annual revenues typically ranging from $30,000 to $90,000. The organization has maintained a healthy asset base, with assets consistently exceeding liabilities, indicating good financial stability. For instance, in the 202406 period, assets were $58,363 with $0 liabilities. While expenses have sometimes exceeded revenue, such as in 202406 where expenses were $108,473 against $92,279 in revenue, this is not uncommon for smaller arts organizations and does not appear to be a persistent, severe issue given the overall asset health. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings suggests a volunteer-driven leadership structure, which can contribute to lower administrative costs and a higher proportion of funds directed towards programs.
The organization's financial health appears stable for its size, with no significant debt burden. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over many years indicates a commitment to transparency. The absence of officer compensation is a notable positive, suggesting that resources are primarily allocated to the festival's mission rather than executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) within the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The overall trend shows a resilient organization that manages to sustain its operations and maintain a modest but stable financial position.