Is Mba Wilson Tr Agreement Legit?

Quick charity verification for Mba Wilson Tr Agreement (EIN: 207496568)

Verdict: Mba Wilson Tr Agreement appears trustworthy

75/100Mission Score
$865KRevenue
$9.5MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Mba Wilson Tr Agreement allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Mba Wilson Tr Agreement

Is Mba Wilson Tr Agreement a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mba Wilson Tr Agreement (EIN: 207496568) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Mba Wilson Tr Agreement a good charity to donate to?

Mba Wilson Tr Agreement has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $865K. Assets: $9.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Mba Wilson Tr Agreement?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mba Wilson Tr Agreement is 207496568. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Mba Wilson Tr Agreement spend its money?

Mba Wilson Tr Agreement allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Mba Wilson Tr Agreement's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Mba Wilson Tr Agreement's tax-exempt status using EIN 207496568 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Mba Wilson Tr Agreement demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating significantly over the past decade, ranging from a low of negative $15,452 in 2020 to a high of $1,067,724 in 2023. Expenses have shown a general upward trend, reaching $925,655 in 2023. The organization maintains substantial assets, consistently above $9.5 million, with liabilities remaining minimal at $1 for most recent periods, indicating a strong balance sheet. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a volunteer-led structure or that compensation is not reported in a manner captured by this data point, which could impact transparency assessment depending on the actual operational model. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses. However, the consistent expenditure levels relative to revenue, particularly in years where expenses exceeded revenue (e.g., 2022, 2021, 2020), suggest that the organization is actively deploying its resources. The significant asset base provides a strong financial cushion, allowing for sustained operations even during periods of lower revenue. Transparency regarding executive compensation is high, as zero officer compensation is reported. However, a more granular breakdown of expenses would enhance the understanding of how funds are allocated across different functions, improving overall financial transparency. The consistent filing of IRS 990s demonstrates a commitment to regulatory compliance.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages