Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential inactivity or significant change.
Significant liabilities ($220,096) exceeding assets ($112,096) in 2016 filing.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown in available data makes full spending efficiency assessment difficult.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across multiple years, indicating lean leadership costs.
Historically maintained a relatively stable level of revenue and expenses between 2012 and 2016.
Spending Breakdown
How Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission
Is Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission (EIN: 10278734) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission a good charity to donate to?
Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission is 10278734. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission spend its money?
Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission's tax-exempt status using EIN 10278734 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Mid Coast Regional Planning Commission appears to be a very small organization with limited financial activity, as indicated by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. However, historical filings show consistent, albeit modest, revenue and expenses in the range of $74,000 to $95,000 annually between 2012 and 2016. The organization consistently reported zero officer compensation during these periods, which suggests a volunteer-led or very lean operational structure. The significant liability of $220,096 reported in 2016, compared to assets of $112,096, is a notable concern, indicating potential financial strain or a specific accounting event that year. Without more detailed expense breakdowns, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency, but the lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator of resource allocation.