Is Mid Klamath Watershed Council Legit?

Quick charity verification for Mid Klamath Watershed Council (EIN: 201501256)

Verdict: Mid Klamath Watershed Council appears trustworthy

95/100Mission Score
$7.9MRevenue
$5.1MAssets
2Red Flags
5Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Mid Klamath Watershed Council allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
7%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
3%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Mid Klamath Watershed Council

Is Mid Klamath Watershed Council a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mid Klamath Watershed Council (EIN: 201501256) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 95/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.

Is Mid Klamath Watershed Council a good charity to donate to?

Mid Klamath Watershed Council has a Mission Score of 95/100. Revenue: $7.9M. Assets: $5.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Mid Klamath Watershed Council?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mid Klamath Watershed Council is 201501256. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Mid Klamath Watershed Council spend its money?

Mid Klamath Watershed Council allocates 90% to programs, 7% to administration, and 3% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Mid Klamath Watershed Council's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Mid Klamath Watershed Council's tax-exempt status using EIN 201501256 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Mid Klamath Watershed Council demonstrates strong financial health and growth, with its latest reported revenue at $7,932,551 and assets at $5,098,232. Over the past decade, the organization has shown consistent revenue growth, from $1,194,826 in 2014 to $6,226,875 in 2023, indicating increasing capacity and impact. The organization consistently spends a high proportion of its budget on program services, as evidenced by the efficient use of funds where expenses are closely aligned with revenue, suggesting effective resource allocation towards its mission. The absence of reported officer compensation across all available filings is a significant indicator of transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards programmatic activities rather than executive salaries. Spending efficiency appears robust, with expenses generally tracking closely to revenue, indicating that the organization is actively deploying its resources rather than accumulating excessive reserves. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $5,756,420 against revenues of $6,226,875. This close margin suggests that the majority of incoming funds are being utilized for current operations and programs. The consistent growth in assets, from $396,441 in 2014 to $3,446,868 in 2023, also reflects sound financial management and an increasing capacity to undertake larger projects. Transparency is a notable strength, particularly with the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings. This practice signals a strong commitment to public trust and ensures that donor funds are directly supporting the organization's mission. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 13 periods further underscores their dedication to accountability and public disclosure.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages