Is Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf Legit?

Quick charity verification for Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf (EIN: 111700961)

Verdict: Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$10.7MRevenue
$21.3MAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf

Is Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf (EIN: 111700961) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf a good charity to donate to?

Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $10.7M. Assets: $21.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf is 111700961. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf spend its money?

Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Mill Neck Manor Luthern School For The Deaf's tax-exempt status using EIN 111700961 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Mill Neck Manor Lutheran School For The Deaf demonstrates consistent operational activity with revenues generally exceeding or closely matching expenses in recent years, such as the 202306 period where revenue was $10,806,450 against expenses of $10,162,757. However, a notable concern is the significant increase in liabilities observed from 202006 onwards, peaking at $34,773,815 in 202006 and remaining high at $30,636,358 in 202306, compared to much lower levels (e.g., $6,131,827 in 201906). This shift in the balance sheet warrants further investigation to understand the nature of these liabilities and their potential impact on long-term financial stability. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which suggests a strong commitment to directing funds towards its mission rather than executive pay, enhancing its transparency and public trust regarding compensation practices. While the organization's revenue has remained relatively stable, hovering around $10-14 million annually, the substantial increase in liabilities relative to assets (e.g., assets of $20,604,500 vs. liabilities of $30,636,358 in 202306) indicates a potentially precarious financial position. This negative net asset position, particularly in recent years, raises questions about the organization's ability to cover its obligations with its current assets. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation is a positive indicator of financial stewardship in that specific area, but the overall financial health is impacted by the liability structure. To fully assess spending efficiency, a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses would be necessary, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operational expenses relative to revenue suggest a stable level of activity. The transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with no reported officer compensation. The primary area for concern regarding financial health and transparency lies in the significant and sustained increase in liabilities, which could indicate underlying financial challenges or specific long-term debt structures that are not immediately clear from the summary data.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages