Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown in provided data, making precise program efficiency assessment difficult.
Strengths
Consistent revenue growth over the past decade, from $159,553 in 2014 to $388,904 in 2023.
Significant asset accumulation, growing from $24,670 in 2014 to $811,939 in 2023.
Zero reported liabilities across all filings, indicating strong financial stability.
No reported officer compensation, potentially leading to lower administrative costs.
Spending Breakdown
How Minnesota Voters Alliance allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Minnesota Voters Alliance
Is Minnesota Voters Alliance a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Minnesota Voters Alliance (EIN: 202957982) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Minnesota Voters Alliance a good charity to donate to?
Minnesota Voters Alliance has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $367K. Assets: $996K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Minnesota Voters Alliance?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Minnesota Voters Alliance is 202957982. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Minnesota Voters Alliance spend its money?
Minnesota Voters Alliance allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Minnesota Voters Alliance's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Minnesota Voters Alliance's tax-exempt status using EIN 202957982 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Minnesota Voters Alliance demonstrates a consistent pattern of financial growth and strong asset accumulation over the past decade. Revenue has steadily increased from $159,553 in 2014 to $388,904 in 2023, with assets growing significantly from $24,670 to $811,939 in the same period. This indicates effective fundraising and financial management, allowing the organization to build a substantial reserve. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities, which is a strong indicator of financial stability and responsible fiscal practices.
Spending efficiency appears robust, as expenses have generally remained well below revenue, leading to healthy surpluses each year. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $172,412 against revenues of $388,904, resulting in a significant surplus. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests that leadership may be volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which could contribute to lower administrative overhead. However, without a detailed functional expense breakdown, it's challenging to precisely assess program spending versus administrative and fundraising costs.
In terms of transparency, the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 12 periods is a positive sign. The clear reporting of revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities provides a good overview of the organization's financial health. The lack of reported officer compensation, while potentially a cost-saving measure, could also raise questions about how key personnel are compensated or if the organization is entirely volunteer-run at the leadership level. Further detail on functional expenses would enhance transparency regarding how funds are allocated to programs versus overhead.