Quick charity verification for Mir Parents (EIN: 10829469)
Verdict: Mir Parents shows mixed signals
40/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent deficit spending across multiple years (e.g., $21,442 expenses vs. $17,255 revenue in 2013).
Declining asset base over time (from $36,648 in 2011 to $23,182 in 2013).
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential inactivity or cessation of operations.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported, suggesting a volunteer-driven model and efficient use of funds for leadership.
Spending Breakdown
How Mir Parents allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Mir Parents
Is Mir Parents a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mir Parents (EIN: 10829469) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Mir Parents a good charity to donate to?
Mir Parents has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Mir Parents?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mir Parents is 10829469. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Mir Parents spend its money?
Mir Parents allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Mir Parents's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Mir Parents's tax-exempt status using EIN 10829469 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Mir Parents appears to be a very small organization, as indicated by its modest revenues and assets over the filing periods. The latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which could suggest inactivity or a significant change in operations. In previous years, the organization consistently spent more than it brought in, with expenses exceeding revenue by $4,187 in 2013, $9,940 in 2012, and $6,468 in 2011. This trend of deficit spending, coupled with declining assets from $36,648 in 2011 to $23,182 in 2013, raises concerns about its long-term financial sustainability. The absence of officer compensation across all reported periods suggests a volunteer-driven model, which can be a positive for efficiency, but the overall financial picture points to an organization that has struggled to maintain financial equilibrium and may no longer be operational given the latest $0 figures.