How Miss Montana Scholarship Program allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Miss Montana Scholarship Program
Is Miss Montana Scholarship Program a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Miss Montana Scholarship Program (EIN: 202201586) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Miss Montana Scholarship Program a good charity to donate to?
Miss Montana Scholarship Program has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Miss Montana Scholarship Program?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Miss Montana Scholarship Program is 202201586. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Miss Montana Scholarship Program spend its money?
Miss Montana Scholarship Program allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Miss Montana Scholarship Program's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Miss Montana Scholarship Program's tax-exempt status using EIN 202201586 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Miss Montana Scholarship Program demonstrates consistent, albeit modest, financial activity over the past decade. The organization's revenue and expenses have fluctuated, with expenses exceeding revenue in several recent periods, such as 2022 ($58,039 in expenses vs. $57,371 in revenue) and 2021 ($88,843 in expenses vs. $77,509 in revenue). This indicates a reliance on prior year reserves or other funding mechanisms to cover operational costs. The organization maintains a healthy asset base relative to its liabilities, with assets of $60,869 and liabilities of $32,929 in 2022, suggesting a degree of financial stability despite occasional operating deficits.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operation over a decade with relatively stable asset levels suggests a functional, if lean, operation. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates that executive leadership is likely volunteer-based, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence as it implies resources are directed towards the mission rather than high salaries.
Transparency appears to be adequate given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s. The organization's financial health is stable but not robust, operating on a relatively small budget. Donors should be aware of the occasional operating deficits, but the lack of executive compensation is a strong positive indicator of mission focus.