Reported 0% officer compensation, suggesting efficient use of funds for leadership.
Spending Breakdown
How Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc
Is Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc (EIN: 202043480) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc a good charity to donate to?
Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc is 202043480. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc spend its money?
Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202043480 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Mont Marie Senior Residence Inc. appears to be a financially stable organization, consistently maintaining significant assets over the past four reported periods, averaging over $3.4 million. However, the organization has consistently reported expenses exceeding revenue in three of the four most recent filings (2013-2015), indicating an operational deficit. For example, in 2015, expenses were $469,893 against revenues of $417,509. While the organization has no reported officer compensation, which can be a positive sign for resource allocation, the consistent operational deficit warrants closer examination to understand how these deficits are being covered and if they are sustainable long-term. The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to assess spending efficiency beyond the top-line figures.
The organization's financial health, while supported by substantial assets, shows a trend of spending more than it earns from operations. This could be due to depreciation of assets, investment losses, or other non-operating expenses not detailed here. The absence of revenue and asset data for the latest period (indicated as $0) is concerning and suggests either a significant change in operations or an incomplete data set, which impacts the ability to provide a current assessment of financial health. Without more recent and detailed financial statements, it's challenging to fully understand the current operational status and long-term viability.