Consistent financial surpluses in recent years (e.g., $103,013 revenue vs. $88,667 expenses in 2024).
Zero reported liabilities across all nine filings, indicating strong financial health.
0% officer compensation reported, suggesting highly efficient use of funds for leadership.
Healthy and growing asset base, reaching $121,884 in 2024.
Long history of consistent IRS 990 filings, demonstrating transparency and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Montana Bioscience Alliance allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Montana Bioscience Alliance
Is Montana Bioscience Alliance a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Montana Bioscience Alliance (EIN: 201647600) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Montana Bioscience Alliance a good charity to donate to?
Montana Bioscience Alliance has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $103K. Assets: $122K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Montana Bioscience Alliance?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Montana Bioscience Alliance is 201647600. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Montana Bioscience Alliance spend its money?
Montana Bioscience Alliance allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Montana Bioscience Alliance's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Montana Bioscience Alliance's tax-exempt status using EIN 201647600 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Montana Bioscience Alliance demonstrates consistent financial stability for an organization of its size, with recent revenues hovering around $100,000 annually. In the latest filing (Period 202406), the organization reported revenues of $103,013 against expenses of $88,667, resulting in a surplus that contributes to its growing asset base of $121,884. This trend of managing expenses below revenue is generally positive, indicating sound financial management and the ability to build reserves. The organization has consistently reported zero liabilities across all available filings, which is a strong indicator of financial health and low risk.
Spending efficiency appears to be well-managed, particularly given the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all nine filings. This suggests that the organization's leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence regarding overhead. Without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses, it's challenging to precisely determine program versus administrative spending ratios, but the overall financial picture suggests a lean operation.
Transparency is high regarding executive compensation, as the 0% officer compensation is clearly stated. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over a long period (9 filings since 2011) also indicates a commitment to regulatory compliance and public disclosure. The organization's financial health appears robust for its scale, with a healthy asset-to-liability ratio and a history of operating within its means, contributing to a positive overall assessment.