History of positive net assets in active years (e.g., $52,500 in 2012)
Spending Breakdown
How Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association
Is Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association (EIN: 201676263) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association a good charity to donate to?
Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association is 201676263. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association spend its money?
Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 201676263 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Mountain Country Quarter Midget Association appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on its financial filings. With zero revenue and assets in its latest filing, and very modest figures in prior years (e.g., $12,995 revenue in 2012), it likely operates with minimal overhead. The organization has consistently reported 0% officer compensation, indicating a strong reliance on unpaid leadership, which is a positive sign for donor confidence and efficient use of funds. However, the lack of recent financial activity and the absence of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data make a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency challenging. The organization's transparency is limited by the minimal data available, but the consistent filing of 990s, even with zero activity, shows a basic level of compliance.