Quick charity verification for National Asociation Of Women Mbas (EIN: 203906991)
Verdict: National Asociation Of Women Mbas shows mixed signals
45/100Mission Score
$489KRevenue
$16KAssets
4Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Significant and recurring deficit spending, with expenses exceeding revenue in multiple periods (e.g., $570,138 expenses vs. $489,211 revenue in 201712).
Drastic decline in assets from $114,857 in 201612 to $16,250 in 201712, indicating a severe erosion of financial reserves.
High liabilities ($187,427 in 201712) relative to very low assets ($16,250), suggesting potential insolvency.
NTEE code Z99 (Unknown) makes it difficult to understand the organization's specific mission and compare its financial performance to peers.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings, indicating a potentially volunteer-led model or high transparency in this area.
Spending Breakdown
How National Asociation Of Women Mbas allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about National Asociation Of Women Mbas
Is National Asociation Of Women Mbas a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Asociation Of Women Mbas (EIN: 203906991) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 4 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is National Asociation Of Women Mbas a good charity to donate to?
National Asociation Of Women Mbas has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $489K. Assets: $16K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for National Asociation Of Women Mbas?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Asociation Of Women Mbas is 203906991. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does National Asociation Of Women Mbas spend its money?
National Asociation Of Women Mbas allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify National Asociation Of Women Mbas's tax-exempt status?
You can verify National Asociation Of Women Mbas's tax-exempt status using EIN 203906991 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The National Association of Women MBAs (NAWMBA) exhibits a concerning financial trend, particularly in its latest filing for the period ending 201712, where expenses ($570,138) significantly exceeded revenue ($489,211), resulting in a net loss. This continues a pattern seen in several prior years, indicating potential operational challenges in maintaining financial equilibrium. The organization's assets have also seen a drastic decline from $114,857 in 201612 to a mere $16,250 in 201712, while liabilities remain substantial at $187,427. This suggests a precarious financial position with limited reserves to cover its obligations.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed functional expense breakdown, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent deficit spending in multiple periods raises questions about the sustainability of its current operational model. The significant drop in assets and persistent liabilities are red flags regarding its long-term viability and ability to fund its programs effectively. The NTEE code Z99 (Unknown) also hinders a clear understanding of its specific programmatic focus and makes it challenging to benchmark its spending against similar organizations.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is high, as the organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation across all available filings. This indicates that its leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor trust. However, the overall financial health, marked by declining assets and recurring deficits, overshadows this positive aspect of transparency.