Is National Association Of Nephrology Technologists Legit?
Quick charity verification for National Association Of Nephrology Technologists (EIN: 141722307)
Verdict: National Association Of Nephrology Technologists shows mixed signals
55/100Mission Score
$431KRevenue
$3KAssets
4Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Extremely low asset base relative to annual revenue (e.g., $2,969 assets vs. $418,327 revenue in 202406).
Consistent liabilities exceeding assets across multiple years (e.g., $4,634 liabilities vs. $2,969 assets in 202406), indicating potential solvency concerns.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown in provided data makes it difficult to assess spending efficiency.
Significant fluctuations in assets and liabilities year-over-year without clear explanation (e.g., assets dropped from $18,976 in 202306 to $2,969 in 202406).
Strengths
Consistent revenue generation, generally covering expenses in recent years (e.g., $418,327 revenue vs. $406,337 expenses in 202406).
No reported officer compensation, suggesting a lean executive structure or volunteer leadership.
Long filing history (14 filings) indicates consistent compliance with IRS reporting requirements.
Spending Breakdown
How National Association Of Nephrology Technologists allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about National Association Of Nephrology Technologists
Is National Association Of Nephrology Technologists a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Association Of Nephrology Technologists (EIN: 141722307) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is National Association Of Nephrology Technologists a good charity to donate to?
National Association Of Nephrology Technologists has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $431K. Assets: $3K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for National Association Of Nephrology Technologists?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Association Of Nephrology Technologists is 141722307. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does National Association Of Nephrology Technologists spend its money?
National Association Of Nephrology Technologists allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify National Association Of Nephrology Technologists's tax-exempt status?
You can verify National Association Of Nephrology Technologists's tax-exempt status using EIN 141722307 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The National Association Of Nephrology Technologists demonstrates consistent operational activity with revenues generally exceeding expenses in recent years, as seen in the 202406 period with $418,327 in revenue against $406,337 in expenses. However, the organization's financial health is concerning due to extremely low assets relative to its revenue, with only $2,969 in assets in the latest filing period. This indicates a very limited financial cushion and potential reliance on immediate cash flow. The organization also consistently carries liabilities that significantly outweigh its assets, such as $4,634 in liabilities in 202406 compared to $2,969 in assets, suggesting potential solvency issues or a reliance on short-term funding.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent pattern of expenses closely tracking revenues suggests that most incoming funds are immediately spent on operations. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates a potential volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which could be a positive for efficiency if program delivery is not compromised. The organization's transparency is moderate; while it files its IRS 990s, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated.
Overall, while the organization manages to operate with revenues generally covering expenses, its minimal asset base and consistent liabilities exceeding assets present significant financial vulnerabilities. A deeper dive into the specific nature of its expenses would be crucial to fully understand its spending efficiency and program impact.