Long filing history (9 filings), demonstrating some level of compliance and existence.
Expenses generally kept below or near revenue in recent years (e.g., $500 expenses vs. $545 revenue in 2022), indicating fiscal prudence at a minimal level.
Spending Breakdown
How National Diabetes Research Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about National Diabetes Research Foundation
Is National Diabetes Research Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Diabetes Research Foundation (EIN: 206529537) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is National Diabetes Research Foundation a good charity to donate to?
National Diabetes Research Foundation has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $545. Assets: $11K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for National Diabetes Research Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Diabetes Research Foundation is 206529537. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does National Diabetes Research Foundation spend its money?
National Diabetes Research Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify National Diabetes Research Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify National Diabetes Research Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 206529537 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The National Diabetes Research Foundation appears to be a very small organization with extremely limited financial activity. In its latest filing (202212), it reported only $545 in revenue and $500 in expenses, with total assets of $11,369. This level of financial activity is minimal for a nonprofit, suggesting it may be largely inactive or operating on a volunteer basis with negligible external funding. The organization consistently reports $1 in liabilities across all filings, which is unusual and could indicate a lack of detailed financial reporting or a very specific accounting practice for minimal obligations.
Given the extremely low revenue and expenses, assessing spending efficiency in traditional terms is challenging. The organization's financial scale is so small that standard ratios for program, administrative, and fundraising expenses would likely be skewed or not meaningfully applicable. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests that any leadership is unpaid, which is a positive for donor confidence regarding executive salaries, but also aligns with the overall minimal financial footprint. The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it impossible to determine specific spending efficiency beyond the overall revenue-to-expense ratio.
Transparency is moderate based on the provided data. The organization has a consistent filing history with 9 filings, which is good for accountability. However, the extremely low financial figures and the consistent $1 liability raise questions about the completeness or typicality of its financial operations. For an organization of this size, detailed financial statements beyond the summary data would be necessary for a thorough transparency assessment.