Is National Foundation For Fertilty Re Legit?

Quick charity verification for National Foundation For Fertilty Re (EIN: 208702202)

Verdict: National Foundation For Fertilty Re appears trustworthy

85/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How National Foundation For Fertilty Re allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about National Foundation For Fertilty Re

Is National Foundation For Fertilty Re a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Foundation For Fertilty Re (EIN: 208702202) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is National Foundation For Fertilty Re a good charity to donate to?

National Foundation For Fertilty Re has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for National Foundation For Fertilty Re?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Foundation For Fertilty Re is 208702202. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does National Foundation For Fertilty Re spend its money?

National Foundation For Fertilty Re allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify National Foundation For Fertilty Re's tax-exempt status?

You can verify National Foundation For Fertilty Re's tax-exempt status using EIN 208702202 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The National Foundation For Fertility Re appears to be a financially stable organization based on its historical IRS 990 filings. Over the four-year period from 2011 to 2014, the organization consistently generated over $1.2 million in revenue annually, with expenses generally staying below or slightly above revenue, indicating a sustainable operational model. For instance, in 2014, revenue was $1,291,681 against expenses of $1,221,016, resulting in a surplus. The organization also maintained a healthy asset base, growing from $176,717 in 2011 to $319,970 in 2014, with no reported liabilities, which is a strong indicator of financial health and responsible management. Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's challenging to provide a precise assessment. However, the consistent surplus in most years suggests that the organization is managing its overall expenditures effectively within its revenue streams. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates either a volunteer-led executive team or compensation below reporting thresholds, which could be a positive sign for donor confidence, as more funds are potentially directed towards the mission rather than executive salaries. In terms of transparency, the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s demonstrates a commitment to public disclosure. The lack of reported liabilities is also a positive transparency signal, indicating a clear financial position without significant debt. However, the NTEE code being 'Unknown' and the latest reported revenue and assets being $0 could be a concern if these are recent figures not reflected in the provided historical data, potentially indicating a significant change in operational status or a data gap.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages