Is National Human Services Assembly Legit?

Quick charity verification for National Human Services Assembly (EIN: 131624112)

Verdict: National Human Services Assembly shows mixed signals

65/100Mission Score
$139KRevenue
$74KAssets
3Red Flags
2Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How National Human Services Assembly allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about National Human Services Assembly

Is National Human Services Assembly a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Human Services Assembly (EIN: 131624112) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is National Human Services Assembly a good charity to donate to?

National Human Services Assembly has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $139K. Assets: $74K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for National Human Services Assembly?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Human Services Assembly is 131624112. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does National Human Services Assembly spend its money?

National Human Services Assembly allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify National Human Services Assembly's tax-exempt status?

You can verify National Human Services Assembly's tax-exempt status using EIN 131624112 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The National Human Services Assembly exhibits inconsistent financial performance over the past decade, with significant fluctuations in revenue and expenses. For instance, in 2023, the organization reported a substantial revenue of $889,894 against expenses of $265,331, leading to a surplus. However, this contrasts sharply with previous years like 2022, where expenses ($294,508) exceeded revenue ($166,183), and 2019, where expenses ($899,956) were more than double the revenue ($364,036). This volatility suggests potential challenges in maintaining stable funding or managing operational costs effectively. The organization's asset base has also varied considerably, from a high of $1,159,741 in 2014 to a low of $73,681 in the latest reported period. The liabilities have also shown significant swings, reaching $753,227 in 2022, which exceeded assets in that year. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates a potential strength in minimizing administrative overhead related to executive pay, or that compensation is structured differently and not reported in this category. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the top-line figures. Overall, while the lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator for transparency regarding executive pay, the inconsistent financial results and fluctuating asset-to-liability ratios suggest a need for greater financial stability and clearer reporting on how expenses are allocated to programs, administration, and fundraising. The significant swings in revenue and expenses make it difficult to project long-term financial health without more granular data.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages