Quick charity verification for National Rural Health Association (EIN: 10363873)
Verdict: National Rural Health Association appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$9.9MRevenue
$14.0MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent 0% officer compensation reported, which is atypical for an organization of this size and could obscure actual executive remuneration.
Significant year-over-year revenue fluctuations (e.g., $14.6M in 2022 to $7.9M in 2023) could indicate reliance on less predictable funding sources.
Strengths
Strong financial health with consistent operational surpluses, as seen in 2023 where revenue ($7,941,132) exceeded expenses ($7,618,190).
Substantial asset growth, increasing from $1.7 million in 2020 to $11.9 million in 2023, indicating effective financial management and resource accumulation.
Low liabilities relative to assets, with liabilities of $1,728,105 against assets of $11,978,194 in 2023, suggesting strong solvency.
Consistent positive net assets, demonstrating the organization's ability to build and maintain financial reserves over time.
Spending Breakdown
How National Rural Health Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about National Rural Health Association
Is National Rural Health Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Rural Health Association (EIN: 10363873) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is National Rural Health Association a good charity to donate to?
National Rural Health Association has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $9.9M. Assets: $14.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for National Rural Health Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Rural Health Association is 10363873. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does National Rural Health Association spend its money?
National Rural Health Association allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify National Rural Health Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify National Rural Health Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 10363873 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The National Rural Health Association (NRHA) demonstrates a generally healthy financial position with significant asset growth over the past few years, from $1.7 million in 2020 to $11.9 million in 2023. This growth, particularly the jump from $2.3 million in 2021 to $10.6 million in 2022, suggests successful fundraising or investment activities. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, as seen in 2023 where revenue of $7,941,132 exceeded expenses of $7,618,190, indicating sound financial management. Their liabilities are consistently a small fraction of their assets, further reinforcing financial stability.
Spending efficiency appears strong, with a significant portion of expenses likely directed towards program services, given the lack of reported officer compensation. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings is a notable aspect of their transparency, suggesting that top leadership may be compensated through other means or that the organization prioritizes directing funds elsewhere. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited.
Overall, NRHA exhibits good financial health and a commitment to transparency regarding executive compensation. The substantial increase in assets and consistent operational surpluses point to a well-managed organization capable of sustaining its mission. Further detail on functional expenses would enhance the understanding of their spending efficiency.