Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in available data.
Potential reliance on asset drawdowns to cover operating costs.
Strengths
Consistent revenue stream over the past decade, averaging around $50,000.
Zero reported liabilities across all filings, indicating no debt burden.
Stable asset base, typically around $140,000, providing some financial cushion.
No reported officer compensation, suggesting low executive overhead.
Spending Breakdown
How National Treasury Employees Union allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about National Treasury Employees Union
Is National Treasury Employees Union a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, National Treasury Employees Union (EIN: 16019419) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is National Treasury Employees Union a good charity to donate to?
National Treasury Employees Union has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $50K. Assets: $112K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for National Treasury Employees Union?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for National Treasury Employees Union is 16019419. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does National Treasury Employees Union spend its money?
National Treasury Employees Union allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify National Treasury Employees Union's tax-exempt status?
You can verify National Treasury Employees Union's tax-exempt status using EIN 16019419 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) appears to be a small, stable organization based on its consistent revenue and asset levels over the past decade, typically hovering around $50,000 in revenue and $140,000 in assets. However, the organization has frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses exceeding revenue in several recent years, such as 2023 ($63,147 expenses vs. $49,739 revenue) and 2022 ($72,121 expenses vs. $46,581 revenue). This trend suggests that the union may be drawing down its assets to cover operational costs, which is a concern for long-term financial sustainability if not addressed. The consistent reporting of zero liabilities across all filings indicates a healthy balance sheet in terms of debt, but the recurring operational deficits warrant closer examination.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's challenging to fully assess. However, the absence of reported officer compensation in all available filings suggests that executive costs are either very low or covered by other means, which could be a positive indicator of efficiency if the organization's mission is being effectively pursued. The consistent asset base, despite deficits, implies some financial resilience, but the pattern of spending more than it earns is a significant financial health indicator to monitor. Transparency is generally good with consistent annual filings, but the lack of detailed expense categories limits a deeper analysis of spending efficiency.
Overall, the NTEU demonstrates financial stability in its asset base and lack of debt, but its operational model frequently results in expenses exceeding revenue. This pattern, while not immediately critical given its asset base, is not sustainable indefinitely and could erode its financial reserves over time. The organization's transparency is adequate through its 990 filings, but more granular expense data would enhance understanding of its spending efficiency.