Quick charity verification for Native American Contractors Association (EIN: 200438232)
Verdict: Native American Contractors Association appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$829KRevenue
$984KAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Declining revenue trend over the past decade, from $1.88M in 2014 to $525,771 in 2023.
Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided data prevents precise spending efficiency analysis.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all 13 filings, indicating strong financial stewardship regarding executive pay.
Healthy growth in assets, from $258,429 in 2017 to $697,281 in 2023.
Low liabilities relative to assets (e.g., $42,256 liabilities vs. $697,281 assets in 2023), indicating strong financial solvency.
Expenses generally align with revenues, suggesting funds are being utilized for operations (e.g., $535,870 expenses vs. $525,771 revenue in 2023).
Spending Breakdown
How Native American Contractors Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Native American Contractors Association
Is Native American Contractors Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Native American Contractors Association (EIN: 200438232) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Native American Contractors Association a good charity to donate to?
Native American Contractors Association has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $829K. Assets: $984K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Native American Contractors Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Native American Contractors Association is 200438232. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Native American Contractors Association spend its money?
Native American Contractors Association allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Native American Contractors Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Native American Contractors Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 200438232 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Native American Contractors Association (NACA) demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally in line with each other over the past decade. While the organization experienced a peak in revenue around 2014-2016 (e.g., $1.88M in 2014), it has seen a gradual decline, stabilizing around the $500K-$800K range in recent years, with the latest reported revenue at $525,771 for 2023. The organization's assets have shown a positive trend, growing from $258,429 in 2017 to $697,281 in 2023, indicating a healthy accumulation of resources relative to its liabilities, which remain low (e.g., $42,256 in 2023). This suggests a stable financial position, though the decreasing revenue trend warrants monitoring.
NACA's spending efficiency appears reasonable, with expenses closely tracking revenues. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $535,870 against revenues of $525,771, indicating that most funds are being utilized for operations. A notable strength in transparency is the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings. This indicates that the organization's leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding executive pay. However, without a detailed functional expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising), a precise assessment of spending efficiency cannot be fully determined from the provided data.
Overall, NACA appears to be a financially stable organization with a clear commitment to not compensating its officers directly through the reported channels. Its asset growth and low liabilities are positive indicators. The primary area for further scrutiny would be the detailed breakdown of its expenses to ensure a high percentage of funds are directed towards its programmatic mission, especially given the declining revenue trend over the past several years.