Is Negative Population Growth Legit? —…

Strengths

Consistent growth in net assets, from $3,932,237 in 2011 to $8,818,460 in 2014, demonstrating financial stability.
Very low liabilities across all reported periods (e.g., $20,693 in 2014), indicating strong financial management and minimal debt.
Reported 0% officer compensation for all years, suggesting a highly efficient use of funds for its mission or a volunteer-led executive structure.
Revenue generally exceeding expenses, particularly in 2014 ($1,732,098 revenue vs. $1,662,158 expenses), contributing to asset growth.

Spending Breakdown

How Negative Population Growth allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

80%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Negative Population Growth

Is Negative Population Growth a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Negative Population Growth (EIN: 132727625) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Negative Population Growth a good charity to donate to?

Negative Population Growth has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Negative Population Growth?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Negative Population Growth is 132727625. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Negative Population Growth spend its money?

Negative Population Growth allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Negative Population Growth's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Negative Population Growth's tax-exempt status using EIN 132727625 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Negative Population Growth demonstrates a generally stable financial position based on its IRS 990 filings. The organization consistently reported positive net assets, growing from $3,932,237 in 2011 to $8,818,460 in 2014, indicating a healthy accumulation of resources. Revenue fluctuated but showed an upward trend, peaking at $1,732,098 in 2014, which outpaced expenses for that period. The organization's liabilities remained very low across all reported periods, suggesting good financial management and minimal debt burden.

Spending efficiency appears reasonable, with expenses generally aligning with revenue. While specific program, administrative, and fundraising breakdowns are not provided in the summary data, the overall financial health suggests that the organization is managing its resources effectively. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation is a notable aspect, indicating that the top leadership is not drawing a salary from the organization, which can be viewed positively for donor confidence and resource allocation towards the mission.

Transparency is generally good through its consistent 990 filings. The absence of officer compensation is a strong point for transparency and efficient use of funds. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a complete assessment of spending efficiency and program focus is limited. Further analysis of the full 990 forms would be needed to fully evaluate these aspects.

Is Negative Population Growth Legit?

Verdict: Negative Population Growth appears trustworthy

Red Flags