Historically maintained positive assets in most periods, indicating some financial stability in the past.
Spending Breakdown
How Nevada Stem Coalition allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Nevada Stem Coalition
Is Nevada Stem Coalition a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Nevada Stem Coalition (EIN: 205343319) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Nevada Stem Coalition a good charity to donate to?
Nevada Stem Coalition has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Nevada Stem Coalition?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Nevada Stem Coalition is 205343319. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Nevada Stem Coalition spend its money?
Nevada Stem Coalition allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Nevada Stem Coalition's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Nevada Stem Coalition's tax-exempt status using EIN 205343319 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Nevada Stem Coalition appears to be a very small, volunteer-led organization based on its financial filings. With zero revenue and assets in its latest filing, and a history of modest revenues (highest was $87,280 in 2012), it operates on a limited budget. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating a reliance on unpaid leadership, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding executive pay. However, the lack of recent financial activity raises questions about its current operational status and long-term sustainability. While past filings show some fluctuations between revenue and expenses, the overall scale of operations is minimal, suggesting a grassroots or project-based approach rather than a large-scale programmatic effort. The consistent filing of 990-EZ forms (implied by the small revenue figures) indicates a basic level of transparency, but the absence of recent financial data is a concern for current assessment.