Quick charity verification for New England Peer Review In (EIN: 20449751)
Verdict: New England Peer Review In appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$472KRevenue
$339KAssets
1Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
NTEE Code is unknown, which limits understanding of specific programmatic focus.
Strengths
Consistent financial stability with surpluses in most years.
Zero executive compensation, indicating high dedication of resources to mission.
Steady growth in assets over the past decade.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history, demonstrating good compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How New England Peer Review In allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about New England Peer Review In
Is New England Peer Review In a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, New England Peer Review In (EIN: 20449751) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is New England Peer Review In a good charity to donate to?
New England Peer Review In has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $472K. Assets: $339K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for New England Peer Review In?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for New England Peer Review In is 20449751. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does New England Peer Review In spend its money?
New England Peer Review In allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify New England Peer Review In's tax-exempt status?
You can verify New England Peer Review In's tax-exempt status using EIN 20449751 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
New England Peer Review In demonstrates consistent financial operations over the past decade, with revenues and expenses generally in close alignment, indicating a stable, albeit modest, operational scale. For instance, in the latest filing (202404), revenue was $219,176 against expenses of $189,219, resulting in a surplus. The organization has shown steady asset growth, from $128,763 in 2015 to $243,951 in 2024, suggesting prudent financial management and accumulation of reserves. Liabilities have also increased, but remain manageable relative to assets.
The organization's spending efficiency appears sound, given the consistent surpluses in most years and the absence of officer compensation, which suggests resources are directed towards its mission rather than executive salaries. The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes a precise assessment of program versus administrative spending challenging, but the overall financial picture points to a lean operation. Transparency is good in terms of filing history, with 13 filings available, indicating compliance with IRS reporting requirements. However, the NTEE code being 'Unknown' could be a minor point for improvement in clarity regarding its specific programmatic focus.