Quick charity verification for New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System (EIN: 20336884)
Verdict: New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$633KRevenue
$191KAssets
3Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operating deficits (e.g., $710,370 expenses vs. $604,707 revenue in 201905)
Significant decline in assets over time (from $685,056 in 201405 to $190,882 currently)
Fluctuating liabilities, sometimes exceeding assets (e.g., 201905 liabilities $365,699 vs. assets $285,508)
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation, indicating strong resource allocation to mission or lean executive structure.
Stable revenue generation over a decade, averaging around $600,000 annually.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history, demonstrating transparency and accountability.
Continued operation despite financial challenges, suggesting resilience and commitment to mission.
Spending Breakdown
How New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System
Is New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System (EIN: 20336884) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System a good charity to donate to?
New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $633K. Assets: $191K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System is 20336884. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System spend its money?
New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System's tax-exempt status?
You can verify New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System's tax-exempt status using EIN 20336884 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The New Hampshire Pro Bono Referral System demonstrates a consistent commitment to its mission, as evidenced by its stable revenue streams, averaging around $600,000 annually over the past decade. However, the organization has frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses exceeding revenue in most reported periods, such as in 201905 where expenses were $710,370 against revenues of $604,707. This trend has led to a significant decline in assets, from a high of $685,056 in 201405 to $190,882 currently, and a corresponding increase in liabilities in some years, indicating potential long-term financial sustainability challenges if not addressed.
The organization's transparency is commendable, particularly its consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings, suggesting that executive leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence. While specific program spending percentages are not detailed in the provided data, the absence of officer compensation implies a focus on directing funds towards operational and programmatic activities. The consistent filing of IRS 990s over nine periods further reinforces its commitment to public accountability.
Despite the asset decline and frequent deficits, the organization has maintained operations, suggesting effective management of its existing resources and potentially strong donor support that allows it to continue its pro bono services. A deeper dive into the breakdown of expenses (program vs. administrative vs. fundraising) would provide a clearer picture of spending efficiency, but the available data points to a lean operational model given the lack of executive compensation.