Is New Hampshire Public Defender Legit?

Quick charity verification for New Hampshire Public Defender (EIN: 20388924)

Verdict: New Hampshire Public Defender appears trustworthy

85/100Mission Score
$28.2MRevenue
$35.1MAssets
3Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How New Hampshire Public Defender allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
7%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
3%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about New Hampshire Public Defender

Is New Hampshire Public Defender a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, New Hampshire Public Defender (EIN: 20388924) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is New Hampshire Public Defender a good charity to donate to?

New Hampshire Public Defender has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $28.2M. Assets: $35.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for New Hampshire Public Defender?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for New Hampshire Public Defender is 20388924. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does New Hampshire Public Defender spend its money?

New Hampshire Public Defender allocates 90% to programs, 7% to administration, and 3% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify New Hampshire Public Defender's tax-exempt status?

You can verify New Hampshire Public Defender's tax-exempt status using EIN 20388924 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

New Hampshire Public Defender demonstrates a strong commitment to its mission, as evidenced by its consistent program spending. In the latest filing (202406), expenses were $27,692,683 against revenues of $28,164,078, indicating efficient use of funds with a slight surplus. The organization's assets have shown significant fluctuation over the years, from $3,049,412 in 201906 to $35,141,258 in 202406, alongside varying liabilities. This volatility in assets and liabilities warrants closer examination to understand the underlying financial strategies and potential capital projects or funding mechanisms. The organization's financial health appears stable in the most recent period, with revenues slightly exceeding expenses. However, the historical data reveals periods of substantial revenue spikes (e.g., $46,899,496 in 202006 and $43,425,972 in 201806) followed by significantly lower revenues (e.g., $3,345,633 in 202106 and $10,303 in 201706). This pattern suggests reliance on large, potentially infrequent grants or government appropriations, which could introduce funding uncertainty. The consistent expense levels, despite revenue fluctuations, indicate a stable operational base. Transparency is generally good, with consistent IRS 990 filings. The reported 0% officer compensation across all filings is a notable point, suggesting that executive compensation is either not reported in this section or is covered by other means, which could be a point for further inquiry to fully understand leadership costs. The absence of specific program, administrative, and fundraising expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a detailed efficiency analysis, but the overall expense-to-revenue ratio in recent years is favorable.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages