Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, suggesting efficient use of funds for mission-related activities.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), demonstrating transparency and consistent reporting.
Spending Breakdown
How Northwest Senior Housing Corporation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Northwest Senior Housing Corporation
Is Northwest Senior Housing Corporation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Northwest Senior Housing Corporation (EIN: 202203611) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Northwest Senior Housing Corporation a good charity to donate to?
Northwest Senior Housing Corporation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $318K. Assets: $2.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Northwest Senior Housing Corporation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Northwest Senior Housing Corporation is 202203611. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Northwest Senior Housing Corporation spend its money?
Northwest Senior Housing Corporation allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Northwest Senior Housing Corporation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Northwest Senior Housing Corporation's tax-exempt status using EIN 202203611 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Northwest Senior Housing Corporation demonstrates consistent financial operations focused on providing senior housing. Over the past decade, the organization has consistently reported expenses exceeding revenue, leading to a gradual decline in assets from $3,585,373 in 2014 to $2,735,657 in 2023. This trend suggests that the organization is drawing down on its reserves to cover operational costs, which is a sustainability concern if not addressed. However, the liabilities remain relatively low, indicating responsible debt management.
The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data. The consistent deficit spending, with expenses like $383,027 in 2023 against revenues of $256,706, indicates that the current revenue streams are insufficient to cover ongoing operations. The absence of reported officer compensation suggests a volunteer-driven leadership or that compensation falls below reporting thresholds, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation towards mission-related activities.
Transparency appears to be adequate given the availability of 13 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a notable point for transparency regarding executive pay. However, a more detailed functional expense breakdown would enhance understanding of how funds are allocated across programs, administration, and fundraising, allowing for a more precise evaluation of spending efficiency and overall financial health.