Consistently reported 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds regarding executive salaries.
Spending Breakdown
How Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress
Is Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress (EIN: 204247938) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress a good charity to donate to?
Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress is 204247938. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress spend its money?
Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress's tax-exempt status using EIN 204247938 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Ohio Usbc Wba United States Bowling Congress appears to be in a state of financial dormancy or dissolution, as indicated by its latest filing showing $0 in both revenue and assets. This is a significant change from previous years where the organization consistently reported revenues in the range of $350,000 to $430,000 and assets between $113,000 and $190,000. The lack of current financial activity makes it impossible to assess recent spending efficiency or financial health.
Historically, the organization frequently operated with expenses exceeding revenue, such as in 2017 ($438,635 expenses vs. $409,372 revenue) and 2015 ($542,189 expenses vs. $355,541 revenue), suggesting a reliance on prior year surpluses or other funding sources to cover operational costs. The consistent reporting of $0 officer compensation across all available filings indicates a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can be a positive for efficiency if programs are still delivered effectively. However, without current financial data, its present operational status and transparency are unclear.