How Operation Save allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Operation Save
Is Operation Save a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Operation Save (EIN: 203418626) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 88/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Operation Save a good charity to donate to?
Operation Save has a Mission Score of 88/100. Revenue: $422K. Assets: $115K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Operation Save?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Operation Save is 203418626. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Operation Save spend its money?
Operation Save allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Operation Save's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Operation Save's tax-exempt status using EIN 203418626 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Operation Save appears to be in a stable financial position, though it experienced a slight deficit in its most recent reported period. With revenue of $468,651 and expenses of $482,727 in the 202403 period, the organization spent slightly more than it took in. However, its assets of $102,669 against liabilities of $60 indicate a very healthy balance sheet with minimal debt, suggesting good financial management in terms of solvency. The organization's latest reported revenue of $422,217 is slightly lower than the previous period, which warrants monitoring to ensure sustained funding.
Given the available data, the organization demonstrates good spending efficiency, particularly with 0% reported officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of resources being directed towards its mission rather than executive salaries. While a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses is not provided in the summary data, the absence of officer compensation suggests a lean operational structure. The single filing available limits a comprehensive trend analysis, but the current snapshot indicates a financially responsible organization with a strong asset-to-liability ratio.
Transparency is reasonably good, with the organization filing its IRS Form 990. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive sign for donors looking for organizations that prioritize mission over executive pay. Further transparency could be enhanced with more detailed public reporting on program outcomes and a more granular breakdown of expenses beyond what is typically available in summary 990 data.