How Oregon Innovation Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Oregon Innovation Foundation
Is Oregon Innovation Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Oregon Innovation Foundation (EIN: 200072527) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Oregon Innovation Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Oregon Innovation Foundation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $35K. Assets: $26K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Oregon Innovation Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Oregon Innovation Foundation is 200072527. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Oregon Innovation Foundation spend its money?
Oregon Innovation Foundation allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Oregon Innovation Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Oregon Innovation Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 200072527 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Oregon Innovation Foundation exhibits inconsistent financial performance over the past decade, with significant fluctuations in revenue and expenses. While the most recent filing (202312) shows a healthy surplus with revenue of $168,326 exceeding expenses of $83,544, previous years have seen substantial deficits, such as in 201912 where expenses ($225,613) far outstripped revenue ($94,073). The organization's assets have also varied widely, from a low of $1,708 in 202212 to a high of $155,431 in 201412, indicating a lack of stable financial growth or consistent asset accumulation. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead in this area, which is a positive sign for donor confidence.
However, the overall financial health appears volatile, making long-term planning and sustained program delivery potentially challenging. The organization's liabilities have remained relatively stable, hovering around $21,000-$22,000 for most of the reported periods, which is a manageable amount given their revenue in stronger years. The absence of detailed spending breakdowns (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in the provided data limits a full assessment of spending efficiency, but the consistent zero officer compensation is a strong indicator of fiscal prudence in that specific area.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with 0% reported. However, without a breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, it's difficult to fully assess spending efficiency and how effectively donor funds are being utilized for their stated mission. The wide swings in revenue and expenses suggest a need for more stable funding sources or better financial forecasting to ensure consistent operational capacity.