Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided summary data, hindering full efficiency assessment.
Strengths
Long operational history with 13 IRS 990 filings, indicating sustained activity.
No reported officer compensation, suggesting a volunteer-driven leadership or efficient use of funds for executive roles.
Consistent revenue generation, albeit often insufficient to cover expenses.
Spending Breakdown
How Orrington Housing Corp allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Orrington Housing Corp
Is Orrington Housing Corp a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Orrington Housing Corp (EIN: 10357799) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Orrington Housing Corp a good charity to donate to?
Orrington Housing Corp has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $214K. Assets: $548K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Orrington Housing Corp?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Orrington Housing Corp is 10357799. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Orrington Housing Corp spend its money?
Orrington Housing Corp allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Orrington Housing Corp's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Orrington Housing Corp's tax-exempt status using EIN 10357799 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Orrington Housing Corp appears to be in a stable, albeit somewhat constrained, financial position. The organization consistently operates with expenses exceeding revenue, as seen in the 202312 period where expenses were $233,581 against revenues of $200,664. This trend of deficit spending has been consistent across multiple years, leading to a gradual decline in assets from $785,228 in 2014 to $585,917 in 2023. While the organization's liabilities have remained relatively stable, they consistently exceed assets, indicating a reliance on debt or restricted funds.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operational deficits suggest that the organization may be struggling to cover its costs through its current revenue streams. The absence of officer compensation reported across all periods indicates either a volunteer-led board or that compensation is reported under other expense categories, which could impact transparency if not clearly disclosed elsewhere.
Overall, the organization demonstrates a consistent operational history, but the long-term trend of declining assets and persistent deficits warrants closer examination. Transparency could be improved with more detailed expense breakdowns and clarification on how operational deficits are managed and funded over time.