Is Oscar Rixson Foundation Legit?

Spending Breakdown

How Oscar Rixson Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Oscar Rixson Foundation

Is Oscar Rixson Foundation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Oscar Rixson Foundation (EIN: 136129767) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Oscar Rixson Foundation a good charity to donate to?

Oscar Rixson Foundation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $1.7M. Assets: $2.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Oscar Rixson Foundation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Oscar Rixson Foundation is 136129767. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Oscar Rixson Foundation spend its money?

Oscar Rixson Foundation allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Oscar Rixson Foundation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Oscar Rixson Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 136129767 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Oscar Rixson Foundation demonstrates consistent financial stability with substantial assets, reported at $2,216,456 in 2023, significantly exceeding its liabilities of $1,148. However, the organization has consistently operated at a deficit in recent years, with expenses exceeding revenue in all reported periods from 2011 to 2023. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $238,654 against revenues of $195,022. This trend suggests the foundation is drawing down on its asset base to cover operational costs, which, while sustainable in the short term given its large asset base, is not a long-term strategy without a significant increase in revenue or reduction in expenses.

The foundation's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent operational deficits raise questions about the efficiency of its spending relative to its revenue generation. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates a potential strength in minimizing overhead related to executive salaries, or it could imply that officers are uncompensated volunteers, which is common for smaller foundations. Transparency is generally good through its consistent IRS 990 filings, but the lack of detailed expense categorization limits a deeper analysis of its programmatic impact and administrative overhead.

Verdict: Oscar Rixson Foundation shows mixed signals

Red Flags

Strengths