No reported liabilities across all filing periods, indicating excellent financial stability.
Revenue growth from $48,829 in 2022 to $84,520 in 2023, showing increasing support.
Expenses generally lower than revenue, allowing for sustainable operations and asset building.
Spending Breakdown
How Oyster River Womenade allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Oyster River Womenade
Is Oyster River Womenade a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Oyster River Womenade (EIN: 204735844) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 95/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Oyster River Womenade a good charity to donate to?
Oyster River Womenade has a Mission Score of 95/100. Revenue: $70K. Assets: $80K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Oyster River Womenade?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Oyster River Womenade is 204735844. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Oyster River Womenade spend its money?
Oyster River Womenade allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Oyster River Womenade's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Oyster River Womenade's tax-exempt status using EIN 204735844 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Oyster River Womenade demonstrates consistent financial health with a growing revenue trend, reaching $84,520 in 2023, up from $48,829 in 2022. The organization maintains a strong asset base, increasing to $78,089 in 2023, with no reported liabilities across all three filing periods, indicating excellent financial stability and low risk. Their operational efficiency is notable, with expenses consistently lower than revenue in most years, allowing for asset growth. The absence of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests a volunteer-driven model, which significantly enhances their spending efficiency and transparency, as more funds directly support their mission rather than administrative overhead.