Quick charity verification for Pacer Baseball Inc (EIN: 202314116)
Verdict: Pacer Baseball Inc shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$232KRevenue
$18KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
High liabilities relative to assets ($400,000 liabilities vs. $40,861 assets in 202308).
Significant financial deficit in 202212 (Expenses $651,856 vs. Revenue $214,864).
Inconsistent financial performance with large fluctuations in revenue and expenses.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds for leadership.
Positive net income in the latest filing (202308), showing a recent operational surplus.
Long filing history (12 filings) suggests sustained operation over time.
Spending Breakdown
How Pacer Baseball Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Pacer Baseball Inc
Is Pacer Baseball Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pacer Baseball Inc (EIN: 202314116) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Pacer Baseball Inc a good charity to donate to?
Pacer Baseball Inc has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $232K. Assets: $18K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Pacer Baseball Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pacer Baseball Inc is 202314116. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Pacer Baseball Inc spend its money?
Pacer Baseball Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Pacer Baseball Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Pacer Baseball Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202314116 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Pacer Baseball Inc. exhibits inconsistent financial performance and significant liabilities in recent years. While the organization reported a positive net income in its latest filing (202308) with revenues of $167,515 exceeding expenses of $111,980, this follows a substantial deficit in 202212 where expenses ($651,856) far outstripped revenues ($214,864). The organization also reported very high liabilities of $400,000 in 202308 and $420,000 in 202212, which is concerning given its relatively low asset base of $40,861 and $5,326 in those respective periods. This indicates a potential reliance on debt or significant outstanding obligations.
The organization's program spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the overall financial instability, particularly the large liabilities, raises questions about long-term sustainability. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or minimally compensated leadership structure, which can be a positive for donor confidence regarding administrative costs. However, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a precise evaluation of spending efficiency.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with no reported officer compensation. However, the significant and fluctuating liabilities, especially in relation to assets, warrant further scrutiny to understand their nature and the organization's plan for managing them. The overall financial picture suggests a need for improved financial stability and clearer reporting on the nature of its substantial liabilities.