Extremely low assets ($1) indicating no financial reserves.
Significant and consistent decline in revenue from a peak of $135,833 in 2015 to $4,500 currently.
NTEE code N99 ('Nonclassifiable') suggests a lack of clear programmatic definition or reporting.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds for executive pay.
Generally spends close to its revenue, suggesting funds are utilized rather than accumulated excessively (e.g., 201612: Revenue $6,800, Expenses $6,800).
Spending Breakdown
How Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance
Is Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance (EIN: 205243663) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance a good charity to donate to?
Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $5K. Assets: $1. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance is 205243663. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance spend its money?
Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance's tax-exempt status using EIN 205243663 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Pacific Islands Athletic Alliance appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on its financial filings. With a latest reported revenue of $4,500 and assets of just $1, its operational scale is minimal. The organization has consistently reported zero officer compensation across all six filings, indicating a reliance on unpaid leadership, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding executive pay. However, the NTEE code N99 ('Nonclassifiable') suggests a lack of clear programmatic categorization, which could impact transparency regarding its specific activities and mission fulfillment.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses. While the organization generally spends close to its revenue, as seen in periods like 201612 (Revenue $6,800, Expenses $6,800) and 201512 (Revenue $135,833, Expenses $137,084), the lack of granular data on program, administrative, and fundraising costs prevents a precise evaluation of how efficiently funds are being directed to its stated purpose. The significant drop in revenue from a peak of $135,833 in 2015 to $4,500 currently also raises questions about its long-term financial stability and fundraising capacity.
Overall, the organization demonstrates transparency in its executive compensation by reporting zero, but its financial health appears precarious given its minimal assets and fluctuating, currently low revenue. The absence of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a comprehensive assessment of its spending efficiency and program focus. Its small scale and volunteer leadership are notable characteristics.