Healthy financial reserves with assets significantly exceeding liabilities (e.g., $196.6M assets vs. $47.0M liabilities in 2023).
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), indicating compliance and transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Packer Collegiate Institute allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Packer Collegiate Institute
Is Packer Collegiate Institute a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Packer Collegiate Institute (EIN: 111633522) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Packer Collegiate Institute a good charity to donate to?
Packer Collegiate Institute has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $84.7M. Assets: $214.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Packer Collegiate Institute?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Packer Collegiate Institute is 111633522. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Packer Collegiate Institute spend its money?
Packer Collegiate Institute allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Packer Collegiate Institute's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Packer Collegiate Institute's tax-exempt status using EIN 111633522 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Packer Collegiate Institute demonstrates strong financial health and consistent growth in revenue and assets over the past decade. For instance, revenue grew from $45,862,158 in 2014 to $71,478,420 in 2023, and assets more than doubled from $83,680,111 to $196,650,032 in the same period. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, indicating sound financial management and sustainability. The absence of reported officer compensation across all available filings suggests that executive leadership may be compensated through other means or that the organization's structure does not involve direct officer compensation reported in this section, which warrants further investigation for full transparency.
The spending efficiency appears robust, with expenses consistently lower than revenue, allowing for asset accumulation. The NTEE code B200 (Elementary, Secondary Education) suggests that the majority of spending would be directed towards program services, which is typical for educational institutions. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency across these categories is limited. The consistent growth in assets and revenue, coupled with a healthy operating margin, points to a well-managed and financially stable institution.
Regarding transparency, the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 13 periods is a positive indicator. However, the lack of reported officer compensation in the provided data is a notable point. While not necessarily a red flag, it does mean that a key aspect of executive compensation is not immediately apparent from this summary, which could impact a full assessment of transparency and compensation practices. Further review of the full 990 forms would be necessary to understand the complete compensation structure and the allocation of expenses.