Long filing history (14 filings) indicates sustained operation and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation
Is Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation (EIN: 208031765) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation a good charity to donate to?
Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $435K. Assets: $386K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation is 208031765. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation spend its money?
Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 208031765 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Pearson College Of The Pacific Usfoundation demonstrates consistent financial activity with revenues closely matching expenses across all reported periods, indicating a balanced operational budget. For instance, in 2024, revenue was $441,178 and expenses were $441,178. The organization's assets have fluctuated significantly, from a high of $616,116 in 2020 to a low of $51,964 in 2017, and currently stand at $186,840 in 2024. This volatility in asset levels, often mirroring liabilities, suggests a potential reliance on pass-through funding or a lean operational model where funds are quickly disbursed.
The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of efficient use of donor funds and a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead. This practice enhances donor confidence and suggests that resources are primarily directed towards programmatic activities. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total revenue and expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency across programs, administration, and fundraising. The consistent matching of revenue and expenses across all filings suggests a focus on immediate disbursement rather than accumulating significant reserves.
While the 0% officer compensation is a positive transparency aspect, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency. The organization's financial health appears stable in terms of balancing its budget annually, but the fluctuating asset base and the consistent matching of revenue and expenses suggest a model that prioritizes immediate program delivery over long-term asset accumulation. Further details on program spending versus other operational costs would provide a clearer picture of its overall financial health and impact.