Is Pet Partners Of Carbon County Legit?

Quick charity verification for Pet Partners Of Carbon County (EIN: 204807623)

Verdict: Pet Partners Of Carbon County appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Pet Partners Of Carbon County allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Pet Partners Of Carbon County

Is Pet Partners Of Carbon County a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pet Partners Of Carbon County (EIN: 204807623) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Pet Partners Of Carbon County a good charity to donate to?

Pet Partners Of Carbon County has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Pet Partners Of Carbon County?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pet Partners Of Carbon County is 204807623. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Pet Partners Of Carbon County spend its money?

Pet Partners Of Carbon County allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Pet Partners Of Carbon County's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Pet Partners Of Carbon County's tax-exempt status using EIN 204807623 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Pet Partners Of Carbon County, despite its single filing in 2013, demonstrated a financially sound position with revenues significantly exceeding expenses. In 2013, the organization reported $78,832 in revenue against $59,377 in expenses, resulting in a surplus that contributed to its $84,811 in assets with no liabilities. This indicates efficient management of funds during that period. However, the lack of more recent filings makes it impossible to assess current financial health or ongoing operational efficiency. The absence of officer compensation reported in 2013 suggests a volunteer-led or very lean administrative structure, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to mission-related activities. The limited filing history, with only one record from 2013, presents a significant challenge for a comprehensive and current transparency assessment.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages