Latest revenue of $76,815 is significantly lower than the highest reported revenue of $171,198 (2015).
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, suggesting efficient use of funds or volunteer leadership.
Consistent filing of IRS Form 990s, indicating transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Pf Foundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Pf Foundation Inc
Is Pf Foundation Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Pf Foundation Inc (EIN: 200304440) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Pf Foundation Inc a good charity to donate to?
Pf Foundation Inc has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $77K. Assets: $398K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Pf Foundation Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Pf Foundation Inc is 200304440. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Pf Foundation Inc spend its money?
Pf Foundation Inc allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Pf Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Pf Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 200304440 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Pf Foundation Inc appears to be a small private foundation based on its NTEE code (T22) and consistent revenue and asset levels. The organization's financial health shows a concerning trend of declining assets, from $601,744 in 2011 to $398,101 currently, alongside expenses consistently exceeding revenue in most reported periods. For instance, in 2014, revenue was $25,059 while expenses were $88,450, indicating a reliance on existing assets to cover operational costs. This pattern suggests a need for increased fundraising or a reduction in spending to ensure long-term sustainability.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program service expenses versus administrative and fundraising costs, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent deficit spending implies that the organization is not operating efficiently within its current revenue streams. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests good transparency regarding executive pay, as it indicates either a volunteer-led structure or that compensation is below reporting thresholds, which is common for smaller foundations. The organization's transparency is generally good given the availability of its 990 filings, but more detailed expense breakdowns would enhance understanding of its operational efficiency.